Groupthink is a psychological phenomenon that occurs within highly cohesive work groups where the desire for harmony and consensus overrides realistic appraisals of alternatives. While groups offer many advantages in collaborative environments, research in group dynamics has highlighted critical downsides—chief among them, groupthink.
In groupthink scenarios, strong solidarity and loyalty within the team suppress dissenting opinions, discourage critical thinking, and hinder innovation. Members become more focused on avoiding conflict and preserving group cohesion than on making well-reasoned decisions. As a result, the group may overlook risks, ignore red flags, or dismiss novel ideas simply because they deviate from the dominant perspective.
Key Symptoms of Groupthink:
-
Illusion of invulnerability – Excessive optimism that encourages risk-taking
-
Rationalization – Discounting warnings and negative feedback
-
Moral superiority – Believing the group’s values are inherently right
-
Stereotyping outsiders – Viewing opponents or dissenters as weak, evil, or ignorant
-
Peer pressure – Coercing conformity among group members
-
Self-censorship – Suppressing doubts or counterarguments
-
Illusion of unanimity – Mistaking silence for agreement
-
Mindguards – Protecting the group from dissenting information
These tendencies can lead to poor decision-making, unethical outcomes, or failure to anticipate critical issues. Famous real-world examples of groupthink include the Bay of Pigs invasion and the Challenger space shuttle disaster.
Preventing Groupthink:
To counteract groupthink, organizations can implement strategies such as:
-
Encouraging open debate and critical feedback
-
Appointing a “devil’s advocate”
-
Inviting outside opinions
-
Breaking larger groups into smaller, independent teams
-
Holding second-chance meetings before final decisions
Fostering a psychologically safe environment where all viewpoints are respected is essential to sound group decision-making.
« Back to Glossary Index
